|
alienspy12 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
its a sample
if not then it must not be heavy
MacFan1992 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
must admit, the footage looks amazing!
Spatafrano (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hahhahha right..
akaYu07 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
How many times did he change the hand, holding the camera :D
By the way, nice one, planning to buy it after the christmas holydays..
turoasaur (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
sorry to hear about your dad- (in a relative way- I know I didnt know him!) but its nice you want to take up photography in his name- 2 things- just get what your budget can afford, and secondly if you have his d2x use that as well, you will get the hang of it with enough practice...
shayneross (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Um yeah I'm saying the audio quality is flat out bad...has a ringy tone to high frequencies like a low bitrate mp3...compared to the quality of video its like having a ferrari in performance and looks with a suzuki interior...so i think thats reason to complain...but I always say, if you want video get a camcorder, takes great shots...love my camera!!!
BrianKs239 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If you want to trade detail for less noise, it's easy. Just set your NR to high. However, NR=low is the best trade-off between noise and detail for D300.
BTW, the D300 has 1002 segment matrix metering while the D90 has 420 so its metering is never going to be as good. It's just not a D300.
BrianKs239 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think a few D90 buyers were hoping they'd got themselves a "D300 on the cheap," and talked up it's capabilities as perhaps, as its newer it night be even better than the D300.
A nice thought for some; until, DPR's actual review squashed that thought!
Still many D90 owners think that the sensor is identical to that of the D300; It's not! It is similar and probably the same as the Sony A700 sensor and I'm sure the D90 is still a very capable mid-range camera. It's just not a D300.
BrianKs239 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think a few D90 buyers were hoping they'd got themselves a "D300 on the cheap," and talked up it's capabilities as perhaps, as its newer it night be even better than the D300.
A nice thought for some; until, DPR's actual review squashed that thought!
Still many D90 owners think that the sensor is identical to that of the D300; It's not! It is similar and probably the same as the Sony A700 sensor and I'm sure the D90 is still a very capable mid-range camera. It's just not a D300.
hzuiel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Oh and what you said earlier was wrong too, the d300 does not have a "much" better cmos sensor. They are the exact same size, and from what I've read, actually the same one.
Besides, why are you trying to push the D300? If people can afford the D300, okay. If they can't, they can buy the d90 instead. People wouldn't be looking at the review for this camera if they had the money to just go out and buy the absolute best there is. |
