|
sloweatin (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
well it is obvious why the support beams at the base of the building were angle cut it was due to the airplane wings that sliced its way down through like a hot knife through butter... so there goes the whole thermite theory debunked!! suckers!! duh... if an airplane wing can cut off your head... it can definatly slice through steel guirders...
rkelley202 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Bush was only in office a little more the 1 year when 9/11 happend. So it would be pretty tough plan an attack on his on Country.
Denierbud11 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That was part of the central core, and a good portion was still standing and can be seen on videos of the collapse. It certainly did not collapse as fast as the exterior.
yousuckinlife (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i'm talking about the massive 47steel columns that were at the core of both buildings.
Denierbud11 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Are you talking about the concrete core, because a good deal of the exterior skin was standing, you can see this in video's and photos.
yousuckinlife (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
there were more floors underneath the impact zone than there were above it. if you look at the design of the WTC, the floors wrap around the steel beams. so if the floors are to fall on top of each other and that's what caused the collapse, that's fine. but it would have taken a much longer time and the beams would not have been crushed like you say. besides, look at buildings 3/4/5/6. all burnt to a crisp but didn't collapse.
Denierbud11 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The steel was not cut at a perfect angle. It was crushed. The photo you are most likely referring to is a photo of the clean up.
Dont fall for the truther lies.
yousuckinlife (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
heated steel near the top of a 100+story building does not cut the bottom of the steel beams at a perfect angle.
hotjoe300 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If you really believe (or dont)in Loose Change then watch this---
Web URL type it in and watch it for full and Annotated version (has notes displayed on screen throughout) of Loose Change exposing the outright LIES of Avery and his "documentary" ***Includes Sources***. Very eye opening and interesting, give it a look.
(W.W.W)(DOT)lolloosechange(DOT )co(DOT)nr
Wuschlkarin (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
a question about the temperature. It says in the other video that the towers were air-tight and therefore had to be supplied with oxygen. Of course it can´t have been pure oxygen, but still it could have been a cleaner mix and there also must have been tanks. Since fire feeds on oxygen, could this have heated it up? Just to know... |
